Skip to main content
CENGOLIO

Cengolio · Notes · Law

royalty

noun · Lizenzgebühr

Lizenzgebühr for a royalty paid to use a licensed right, but for an author the figure is not the last word, § 32 UrhG gives an unwaivable claim to angemessene Vergütung and § 32a lets the author demand more when the work turns out a success, so a royalty agreed too low can be topped up by law. Gebühr alone is too generic, that is a fee or charge of any kind.

Which translation, when

Lizenzgebührthe royalty as a licence fee, what a licensee pays to use a patent, trademark or work, the ordinary commercial sense.
angemessene Vergütungthe author’s floor, an unwaivable claim to fair remuneration, § 32 UrhG, with a top-up when success is disproportionate, § 32a UrhG, which no royalty clause can contract away.

Why

A royalty is die Lizenzgebühr, the fee paid to use a licensed right, and for straight commercial licensing the word travels well. Where it stops travelling is the author, because German copyright law refuses to let a low figure be final. § 32 UrhG gives the author an unwaivable claim to angemessene Vergütung, a fair fee measured against what is customary and proper, and if the agreed royalty falls short a court adjusts the contract, so a translated royalty clause for an author is a floor set by law, not a ceiling set by agreement. § 32a UrhG, the Fairnessausgleich once nicknamed the Bestsellerparagraph, goes further, if the work becomes a success out of proportion to what the author was paid, the author can demand a further share even years later. Around Lizenzgebühr sit die Tantieme, a success-based share, and for authors die Vergütung, and the machine flat Gebühr, a fee of any sort, loses the licensing sense entirely. So royalty is Lizenzgebühr in commerce, but for an author it drags in a statutory right to be paid fairly that no clause can waive.

Typical mistakes

  • For an author a royalty is only a floor, § 32 UrhG gives an unwaivable claim to fair remuneration and § 32a a top-up on disproportionate success, so an agreed royalty translated as final misstates a figure German law can raise.
  • Gebühr on its own is a fee or charge of any kind, not the licence sense, so a royalty must be die Lizenzgebühr rather than a bare Gebühr.
  • The author’s claim cannot be contracted away, § 32 UrhG, so a royalty clause purporting to settle the matter conclusively promises a finality the UrhG denies.

What matters

Licensing and author agreements diverge on one word: a commercial royalty is die Lizenzgebühr and the figure holds, but an author royalty meets § 32 UrhG, an unwaivable claim to fair remuneration a court can raise, and § 32a for disproportionate success. The clause fixing an author royalty as final has ignored a statutory top-up no contract can waive.

Authority

  1. § 32 UrhG
  2. § 32a UrhG

What the machine misses

Royalty comes back as Lizenzgebühr in machine output for licensing, which is right, or flattens to a bare Gebühr, a fee of any kind that loses the licence sense. What no rendering carries is the author floor, § 32 UrhG makes fair remuneration an unwaivable claim and § 32a adds a top-up when a work succeeds beyond what was paid, so a translated royalty clause for an author reads as the final figure when a German court can raise it, and a Bestseller can reopen a fee agreed years before.

See what the machine does with this clause →

Examples

to pay a royaltyeine Lizenzgebühr zahlen
a royalty rateder Lizenzsatz
royalty-freelizenzgebührenfrei
the author’s remunerationdie angemessene Vergütung
Checked 20 Jul 2026 cengolio.co.uk/notes/royalty